Tbelow are phrases you hear so frequently that they start to lose their interpretation. The words end up being part of a collection, prefer "bite the dust" or "have a blast." The title of Harper Lee"s 1960 timeless To Kill a Mockingbird is like that for me, despite its prouncovered influence on the way I think about the civilization.

You are watching: What does the title to kill a mockingbird mean

The initially time I read To Kill a Mockingbird was as a student in the 8th grade. Memories are tricky, however as I recontact we never talked about the title, or much else, in the book.The many memorable assignment my teacher gave us was to watch the 1962 film version on among the regional television stations. I expect my teacher believed that watching someone else"s vision of the book was safer than having us talk about the concerns of race, class, discrimicountry, and justice it could raise in the time of the heyday of desegregation battles in surrounding Boston.

Despite my teacher"s overlook, To Kill a Mockingbird stuck to me. At initially I noticed it in tiny ways: Walking house from friends’ dwellings in the gloaming I"d pass a yard filled via junk or overgrvery own grass, and also I"d simply know that Boo Radley lived tright here. I had actually to speed up.

As I got older and also learned more, different scenes stuck. Scout confronting the lynch mob. Scout and also Atticus on the porch talking about the upcoming trial. Jem’s outrage after the verdict. As a reader, I came to appreciate the dual narrative of Tom Robinson and Boo Radley, and how it lent itself to reflections on both the universal and the certain ways we think around race and the “other.” One point, but, ongoing to elude me: the book’s title.


*
Gregory Peck (left) and Brock Peters in a pivotal scene from the 1962 film "To Kill a Mockingbird." Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

I"ve read that To Kill a Mockingbird wasn"t Harper Lee"s initially option. Originally she dubbed the book Atticus. I"m happy she didn"t stick with that one. I always discovered the kids in the book far more interesting. SparkNotes, an digital study site, describes, "The title of To Kill a Mockingbird has actually very little bit literal connection to the plot, but it carries an excellent deal of symbolic weight in the book. In this story of innocence destroyed by evil, the "mockingbird" involves represent the principle of innocence. Hence, to kill a mockingbird is to ruin innocence."

The longest quotation about the book"s title appears in Chapter 10, once Scout explains:

""Remember it"s a sin to kill a mockingbird." That was the only time I ever before heard Atticus say it was a sin to perform somepoint, and also I asked Miss Maudie about it.

"Your father"s right," she shelp. "Mockingbirds do not execute one thing yet make music for us to enjoy…yet sing their hearts out for us. That"s why it"s a sin to kill a mockingbird."

So, that is the symbolic mockingbird? Later in the book, Scout defines to Atticus that hurting their reclusive neighbor Boo Radley would certainly be "type of prefer shootin" a mockingbird." Mockingbirds are not the only birds in the book. Finch, the last name of Scout, Jem, and also Atticus, is a small bird. Like mockingbirds, they are likewise songbirds.

Is Tom Robinson, the black man accsupplied of sexually assaulting a white womale, a bird as well? While Tom is innocent, I perform not think of him as having actually the very same innocence as the children or Boo. As a black male in depression-era Alabama, I"m sure Tom can teach me rather a little. Sadly, we do not learn that much about his life beyond the trial. Critics have actually shelp Lee did not offer the book"s black characters sufficient agency or backstory. I hope Tom wasn"t supposed to be the mockingbird Miss Maudie describes to Scout bereason, consciously or subconsciously, her words evoke old black minstrel stereoforms showing Afrideserve to Americans as happy-go-lucky and singing a song without a treatment in the world. The Tom I imagine isn"t a stereotype. He stays a full life. I wonder what he might tell us that our narrator, young Scout, does not recognize.

See more: Can You Substitute Garlic Powder For Garlic Powder Substitute

When I think of To Kill a Mockingbird, the bird that comes to mind is not a mockingbird at all. It is the proverbial canary in the coal mine (another among those phrases we don"t think around extremely much). The treatment of Tom and also Boo as they challenge the spoken and also unspoken dictates of Maycomb provides life to the stock photo of the canary. These two canaries expose the fragility of democracy as soon as prejudice, myth, and also misinformation go unchecked.

In the years considering that its publication, the title "To Kill a Mockingbird" has developed a definition that goes beyond its inner logic. For many type of readers, the book and also its personalities live with them as intimates. The story supplies a reflection suggest for the ethical crises we confront in our very own lives. As if to prove the allude, a colleague newly carried me a bumper sticker that makes me smile eextremely time I think around it. It asks, "What would Scout do?"

Transform just how you teach Harper Lee"s classical novel with Facing History"s multimedia collection, "Teaching Mockingbird."Our research overview and also lesboy planswill certainly help you use Mockingbird"ssetting as a springboard for engaging students in concerns of justice, gender, and race.

*


Topics: To Kill a Mockingbird, Classrooms, Books, English Language Arts, Facing History Resources, Teaching Resources


*
Visit my Webwebsite
*

Written by Adam Strom

Adam Strom is the Director of The Re-Imagining Migration Project. He is the former Director of Scholarship and also Innovation at Facing History and also Ourselves. He authored, edited, and also produced plenty of digital, print and video resources and publications consisting of Washington’s Rebuke to Bigotry: Reflections On Our First President’s 1790 Letter to the Hebrew Congregation In Newport, Rhode Island, Stories of Identity: Religion, Migration and Belonging in a Changing World, Eyes on the Prize: America’s Civil Rights Movement 1954-1986, Crimes Against Humanity and also Civilization: The Genocide of the Armenians.