I got into an discussion with my uncle about this. My aunt request “Who believed that Buffalo to be the resources of brand-new York?” and my cousin comment “me and also Chris.” mine uncle said this to be incorrect, due to the fact that you wouldn’t say “Me believed Buffalo was the capital,” yet rather “I thought Buffalo to be the capital.” i understand just how this works, yet he never said “...thought Buffalo to be the capital.” every he stated was “me and also Chris.” Does that make sense? to be I appropriate or wrong?


*

My aunt request “Who thought that Buffalo was the capital of brand-new York?” and also my cousin responded me and Chris.” my uncle said this to be incorrect, due to the fact that you wouldn’t say “Me assumed Buffalo to be the capital,” yet rather “I thought Buffalo to be the capital.”

.

You are watching: Me and him or him and me

TLDR: What your cousin responded through is a organic English response. The is grammatical because that today's conventional English.

.

There are miscellaneous grammatical ways of looking at this issue. One reasonable means is to take into consideration that the expression "Me and also Chris" is what stays after a typical conversational deletion that the leading "It was" native the clause "It to be me and Chris", i beg your pardon in its rotate is the truncated 'it'-cleft because that the complete 'it'-cleft "It to be me and Chris who assumed that Buffalo to be the resources of brand-new York."

Also, native English speakers will commonly use the accusative "me" once the 1st person an individual pronoun is involved in a coordination located after the verb, and also will regularly use the "me" as the very first coordinate, as checked out in the OP's "It was me and also Chris".

And so, consider:

"It was me and also Chris who believed that Buffalo was the resources of new York."

"It to be me and also Chris."

"Me and Chris."

And variant #3 ("Me and Chris") is what the OP's cousin comment with.

Also, as soon as a fragment (e.g. "Me and Chris") is spoken where it requires a personal pronoun, the pronoun is frequently in accusative case (e.g. "Me"), especially when uncoordinated. However the OP's example entails a coordination -- the so happens that also for fragments that consist completely of a coordination involving a an individual pronoun as a coordinate, that pronoun will frequently be in accusative case.

See more: How To Make Pcsx2 Run Faster, (I Know This Has Been Asked Before

Consider these possible responses to the question of "Who desires ice cream?":

"Me."

"I."

"Me and also Chris."

"Chris and me."

"I and Chris."

"Chris and also I."

In general, when an individual pronouns comprise the totality fragment or much of that (as in a coordination), those an individual pronouns are typically in accusative instance (e.g. "me"), and also this sort of usage is so common that the accusative instance could be taken into consideration to it is in the default or unmarked instance for an individual pronouns.