How much Is that in Today’s Money?

One of early american Williamsburg’s Most-Asked concerns Is among the Toughest

by Ed Crews


Dave Doody

William Sommerfield, who portrays George Washington at mount Vernon.

You are watching: How much was a guinea worth in 1750

Colonial Williamsburg tourists ask hundreds of questions every work on dozens that topics. Why did men wear wigs? What walk farmers save in barrels? exactly how long walk it take to make a horseshoe? how far can a musket shoot? wherein did Patrick Henry sit in the home of Burgesses? one of the most frequent inquiries is around money.

A visitor could learn indigenous an interpreter that a Virginia teacher in 1759 earn a value of £60 or that a pair of pistols offered for £3, 15 shillings, and also 3 pence in 1755. Perplexed by the eighteenth-century prices, the asks: just how much is the in today’s money?

exactly how much is the in today’s money? It’s one obvious, simple, direct, and logical question. Yet, for all its simplicity and directness, economists say that “how much” is a devilishly complicated riddle. In an article for American heritage magazine, organization writer john Steele Gordon has dubbed it “one the the most intractable troubles a chronicler faces.” Ronald W. Michener, an associate business economics professor at the college of Virginia, look at the problem as much more than intractable.

“Interpreters can’t prize this question,” he said in one interview. “The differences in between today and then are too great to do a comparison. Perceived from the twenty-first century, life in colonial America was prefer living on a various planet.”

comment the “how much” question might be impossible at worst or challenging at best. Nevertheless, financial historians are simply as interested in “How lot is that in today’s money?” as colonial Williamsburg’s visitors and interpreters. Numerous historians desire to understand the modern-day equivalents of such things as the operating spending plan of a James river plantation in 1723, blockade runner earnings in 1863, stole prices in 1886, earnings of a Ford factory worker in 1935, or the price of a B-17 in 1942.

The factor is simple. Such numbers would provide them another insight, provide a usual reference suggest between today and also yesterday. It’s the same factor that visitors ask the “how much” question and interpreters keep in search of a satisfactory answer. According to man A. Caramia Jr., the search never ends.

“We always get come this question throughout staff training due to the fact that interpreters recognize they will obtain this question. It certainly comes increase frequently. They would love a magic number to offer as one answer,” claimed Caramia, a early american Williamsburg regimen manager with an avid attention in the colonial economy.

Caramia to know firsthand the a magic number for “how much” would certainly be handy. He appears as a costumed interpreter top top Tuesdays at the historic Area’s Geddy home for a thirty-minute presentation on running a family business in the 1700s. It touches on cash flow, credit, advertising, merchandising, and also other topics.

yet a magic number isn’t handy, and that’s just one that the challenges in interpreting early american economic realities. The chief problem is time. Visitors and interpreters generally talk because that a couple of minutes. The makes taking care of any facility issue tough, and economics consists some complex ideas.


Dave Doody

John A. Caramia Jr., colonial Williamsburg program manager, tosses a coin—which may be as great a means as any kind of to identify the worth of eighteenth-century money.

Another an obstacle is currency. The eighteenth-century monetary device makes no noticeable sense in 2002. What are pounds, shillings, and pence? are they choose dollars, dimes, and also pennies? lock aren’t. In the 1700s, twelve pence equaled a shilling, and also twenty shillings a pound. The case becomes much more confusing when you find out that prior to the transformation each nest had a distinctive currency, yet each adhered to the pound, shilling, and pence denominations. Data is one more stumbling block. Early american economic information doesn’t satisfy twenty-first-century standards of quality and also quantity. We live in an era wealthy in economic, business, financial, and marketing data. Anybody deserve to visit a library or the Internet and find a wealth of statistics information. This material is therefore vast, therefore personal, and so readily obtainable that modern-day Americans worry that others know too much around them. Privacy has become a political and also legal issue. Once it pertains to economic facts and figures indigenous the early american period, the case is different.


Tom Green

This mishmash that coins and record currency could have to be the day’s receipts in ~ a single store in eighteenth-century America. Every nest had the currency, and money indigenous England and also other countries additionally circulated. Paper bills commonly were valued reduced than their coin equivalents.

historian Thomas L. Purvis wrote about economic worries in the Almanac that American Life: colonial America to 1763. There, he report that more statistical data survives on the economic situation than any other element of early american life. Unfortunately, it is incomplete “for any subject concerning the production, consumption and distribution of early American wealth.” part of the factor is the neither british nor colonial officials compiled statistics the square with contemporary economic concepts like gross nationwide product or per-capita earnings.

such realities space of tiny solace come interpreters trying come answer “how much.” They indicate the safest response is: “Nobody knows precisely.” that is concise and also truthful, but unsatisfying for visitors and also interpreters alike. That answer derails further communication and also the possibility to spark an ext interest in eighteenth-century America. That frustrates everybody.

Another option originates from carried out by john J. McCusker. He is the Ewing Halsell identified Professor that American history and Professor of business economics at Trinity college in mountain Antonio, Texas. McCusker has actually written books on the colonial and also British economies. His emphasis is the economy of the Atlantic civilization during the seventeenth and also eighteenth centuries. A fellow at the Omohundro academy of early American background and culture in Williamsburg throughout the 1970s, he has actually taught economic background to costumed interpreters.


Courtesy the Robert Doares Jr.

This web page from a 1753 “Gentleman’s Magazine,” offering the weights and values the denominations of coins foreign and also domestic, gives an idea that the intricacy of transactions and record maintaining for colonial-era merchants.

for years, McCusker examined the puzzle of converting money values throughout centuries. His work led to development of a an approach for converting so late seventeenth-, eighteenth-, nineteenth-, and twentieth-century financial sums right into twenty-first-century equivalents. His system is explained in his publication How much Is that in actual Money? A historic Price index for usage as a Deflator that Money worths in the economy of the united States. released in 1991, the publication came out in a 2nd edition, mirroring refinements and further study, in so late 2001.

Academicians debate all aspects of make the efforts to transform money of the past into sums that the present. Typically, these discussions space technical and selection from whether the practice is precious the time and effort to calculation techniques and also data. McCusker trust the dispute is healthy and readily admits that his mechanism offers approximations fairly than hard and fast numbers, and relies top top done by him and also others.

“The result, while far from perfect—and significantly less perfect the further ago in time us go—provides us with a reasonable approximation of the contemporary worth of a sum of money from some past time,” McCusker says of his work.


Dave Doody

Hard money—coins to win from precious metal—was the circulating medium of an option in colonial times. Together interpreters Caramia and coachman Edward Merkley win a deal on a horse, the groom, illustrated by Gregory James, gets a tip in change.

His method relies ~ above a commodity price index together the basis for computations. McCusker’s mechanism requires his book and also its tables and access to internet calculators— and also—that crunch numbers. Because that example, using this system, you discover that £750 in Massachusetts during 1750 is worth roughly $48,000 in 2000.

early american Williamsburg’s interpreters couldn’t do these kinds of calculations if a visitor waited. However they could pertained to work through a couple of representative numbers so that travellers would have an almost right answer to your question.

Or would they?

A visitor would recognize “how much” a price from the 1700s might be worth in 2000 dollars. By itself, though, such a figure means almost nothing. Caramia has thought about this issue. He concluded the visitors, though they ask “how much,” desire to recognize something else.

“I don’t think visitors are really asking about prices,” he said. “I believe they desire to know: ‘What walk it take it for people to live comfortable in the eighteenth century?’ The concern is about earnings and also the cost of living. When it pertains to interpretation, we have to make sure we know the concerns actually being asked. Our challenge is to give information our visitors really want.”

If Caramia is right, interpreters confronted with “how much” might consider steering conversations v visitors toward colonial wages. Historians know some specifics about these. An interpreter can say that Jon Boucher, a schoolmaster in Caroline County, Virginia, deserve an yearly salary the £60 in 1759. McCusker’s device tells united state that Boucher’s revenue would be around equal come $4,000 in 2000. However he also got his room and board, and also was in ~ liberty to take it on various other students. In ~ that, Boucher more than likely wouldn’t buy a pair that pistols at £3 15s. 3d., around $340 in 2000; a saddle at £2, almost $180 in 2000; or a wig in ~ £1 12s. 6d., about $145 in 2000. An ext likely purchases and also their 2000 approximations include: a lb of butter, 4d., or $1.50; a yard of flannel cloth, 1s. 3d., or $5.60; a grubbing hoe, 5s. 6d., or $25; a prayer book, 3s., or $13.40; and also a bushel that salt, 4s., or $18. All customer goods above reflect 1755 prices in Virginia, and modern-day figures room rounded for ease of understanding.

Numbers choose these provide a glimpse of early american life and begin to specify what constituted luxury and also necessity in early on America. Visitors conveniently understand concrete numbers and also their implications. Caramia said that this technique has limits, however. Again, data is the trouble for wages and also goods. Chroniclers don’t have sufficient information around enough world to draw broad conclusions about workmen’s yearly incomes. Surviving data is representative but not definitive.

“When you talk about wages and prices, friend must start by asking: ‘What did civilization make?’ Most human being in the 1700s were self-employed, and there to be no earnings tax,” Caramia said. So, no tax records on revenue were generated. “Today, we execute pay income tax and, in the process, create a lot of paperwork and also data.”

A similar problem exists through prices.

What to be the price of living?

“In responding come this question, us do have a range of retail prices to quote. Yet we should remember that most items for sale had more than one price. These multiple price reflected varying features of a particular item. The is likewise impossible come know exactly how individual customer decisions affected particular purchases,” Caramia wrote in a 1996 essay ~ above prices and wages.

although this strategy has lot to introduce it, the university of Virginia’s Michener claims there are limits to any answer provided for “how much.”

“Price indices miss out on the point. There’s no dollar earnings today that would placed you in a similar position to 250 years ago,” stated Michener, who has ubraintv-jp.comed the colonial new England economy. “It was a various world. I’m skeptical around the analogy between particular dollars today and money then.”

The distinctions that Michener notes range widely, spanning technology, attitudes, and also the abundance of herbal resources. If you to be down and also out in colonial brand-new England, you can eat lobster, which was plentiful. The bad today cannot endure on lobster, he said. If you obtained a young cut and it came to be infected, it could kill you. But, today, we have penicillin.

See more: Is It Legal To Kick Your Child Out At 18 Year Old? In California Law

throughout the 1980s, chronicler James B. M. Schick took on a an imaginative exercise in colonial American background to shot to leg the economic gulf Michener to trust divides the past and also present. Schick’s experiment in “how much” highlights the dramatic differences.

because that example, seventeenth-century immigrant were told come buy a foul-weather canvas suit at 7s. 6d. Schick figured the best modern-day approximation was an L. L. Bean Thinsulate Gore-Tex Maine Warden’s Parka and hood at $180. Outdoorsmen may agree the Schick make a an excellent choice. There is, however, no to compare in the comfort and also durability the canvas and modern hi-tech fabricated materials. Likewise, Schick discovered that the only continual ocean business in 1989 between England and also America was the deluxe liner Queen Elizabeth II. He uncovered a deeply discounted fare of $999. In 1624, the passage was £6. Clearly, though, the distinctions are immense in between the luxurious and also comfortable QE II and also a cramped, dangerous seventeenth-century English merchantman.