Oklahoma history CenterResearch CenterMuseums and SitesState historic Preservation Office PublicationsAbout OHSSupport


Sod house of a sharecropper(19184.129.b, Althia Hart Collection, OHS).

You are watching: Difference between sharecropping and tenant farming


Tenant farmer"s home in east Oklahoma(8470.17, approve Foreman Collection, OHS).


When the Civil war ended, the big question came to the state the the freed servants of the South. Restore of the southern economy depended on getting the freedmen back into the noodle fields. Throughout the duration of repair the Radical republicans in congress tried to transform the freedmen into small free-holding farmers, however the previous slaves were simply not all set to manage their very own farms. What emerged out of need was southerly farm tenancy, a mechanism of close to slavery without legal sanctions.

Instead of functioning in gangs together they had on antebellum plantations, the freedmen came to be tenants. The planter or landowner assigned each family a small tract of floor to farm and detailed food, shelter, clothing, and the vital seeds and farm equipment. As soon as the chop was harvested, the planter or landowner took the cotton to market and also after deducting because that the "furnish" (the cost of the items the tenant had been furnished throughout the year), gave half of the proceeds to the tenant. This setup became known as sharecropping.

In the decades after reconstruction tenancy and also sharecropping ended up being the means of life in the noodle Belt. Through 1930 there to be 1,831,470 tenant farmers in the South. What began as a an equipment to get former slaves back to work became a pernicious device that entrapped white as well as black farmers. After 1900 the variety of white tenant farmers grew alarmingly. By 1935 nearly fifty percent of white farmers and 77 percent of black color farmers in the country were landless.

As farm tenancy grew, a tenancy ladder evolved. From the bottom rung, the hapless sharecropper could climb to share tenant if he can accumulate sufficient of his very own equipment and money. Share tenants preserved two-thirds or three-fourths the the crop, depending on how much they can furnish. If a share tenant progressed to a suggest of needing nothing however the land, the could end up being a cash tenant by payment a addressed rental. Cash tenants kept every one of the proceeds from the crop.

Unfortunately, tens of thousands of farmers fell down the tenancy ladder fairly than moving up it. Some farmers lost their farms or their condition as cash or re-publishing tenants due to the fact that of crop failures, low cotton prices, laziness, okay health, bad management, fatigue of the soil, too much interest rates, or i can not qualify to compete with tenant labor. Plenty of tricks the nature (drought, flood, insects, frost, hail, high winds, and plant diseases) might ruin a crop.

Sharecropping and also tenancy remained welcomed as a normal part of southern life till the good Depression. Climate the currently took host that the tenancy mechanism desperately essential reform. However, the early brand-new Deal"s agricultural programs carried no change. Based on drastic acreage reduction and benefit payments that went largely to landowners, in actuality the programs to be a disaster for tenants and also sharecroppers. Once planters and landlords diminished their acreage in manufacturing by 40 or 50 percent, they decreased their tenants through the exact same amount.

Although there room similarities, the story the tenancy in Oklahoma does not fit the pattern of southern farm tenancy. The differences are dictated by the unusual background of the white negotiation of Oklahoma. By 1880 the American farming frontier was ending. Indian territory offered around the critical frontier for an excellent farmland. Indian dominance prohibited white soil ownership. Nor could Indians lease their land come outsiders, yet they could employ whites to work-related their land. Under the subterfuge of gift employees, a flood of white tenants came into the territory in the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s. By 1900 three-fourths of every tenant farmers in Oklahoma to be white. Few of these beforehand arrivals obtained ownership by purchase, connivance, or intermarriage, but a deadly combination of economic and natural forces kept many from rise the farming ladder.

Between 1900 and also 1910 the number of white tenants doubled. When the laws changed after statehood and also non-Indians were permitted to purchase land, tenancy slightly declined. However, in the adverse years of the 1920s, when agriculture suffered from low prices and overproduction, white tenancy climbed again to virtually 70 percent. By 1935, with 119,615 white tenants, Oklahoma had the greatest rate that white tenancy in the unified States.

In the usual setup with share tenants in Oklahoma, the landlord obtained one-third that the grain crop and also one-fourth the the cotton produced. The tenant had to carry out most of the equipment, animals, and also furnish. Realistically, farming forty or fifty acres on this basis to be a prescription because that poverty, particularly when noodle prices plunged.

Tenancy did not necessarily equate v poverty, but in the southerly tier of counties and in the triangle the Southeastern Oklahoma, tenancy devolved right into much the exact same poverty-ridden device that exist in the Deep South and also Texas. Landlords do tenancy species by oral contracts because that one year only. In ~ the end of the year most tenants moved on in search of a better place. Landlords encouraged moving because it prevented the advancement of an developed tenantry. Because of a constant surplus the tenants, or renters together they to be called, in ~ the end of the chop year landlords quickly recruited brand-new renters, often on state even much more favorable to the landlord. In 1920 fully two-thirds of every tenants moved from one farm yard to another.

Because this system of land tenure was so transitory, the landlord was forced to provide nothing yet the land. When this yielded a slim profit ~ above very tiny investment, it to be the road to disaster. Neither the one-year tenant nor the landlord had a factor to make renovations on the soil or to practice conservation. Essentially, they mined the soil. Lugged to its logical conclusion, soil mining would leave the soil eroded and also exhausted. Production would cease, and the landlords, the tenants, and the land would all be ruined.

Black tenancy in Indian Territory has a comparable story. All of the five Tribes had actually black slaves. As soon as the tribesmen were removed to Indian Territory, they brought their servants with them. By 1840 many cotton plantations existed in the Choctaw and also Cherokee Nations, largely in the abundant river bottom of the Arkansas and Red rivers. Most plantations had actually several hundred acre in cotton and dozens of slaves to do the work.

The Civil war disrupted the plantation system in Indian Territory, and also after the war most planters lacked money and manpower come resume operation. Post-war treaties between the U.S. Government and the five Nations forced that servants be freed and also become citizens of the tribes with rights to land. Regardless of a delayed process, eventually most freedmen obtained land assignment of at least forty acres. When this maintained them out of farm tenancy because that a time, in harsh truth a forty-acre farm is not large enough to enable a farmer to gain ahead. In every likelihood, many of the freedmen lost their little farms and also did so because that the same factors that white farmers shed theirs.

In 1930 Oklahoma had actually 22,937 black color farmers, 14,559 of them tenants. Contrasted to 180,929 white farmers, 110,770 of whom to be tenants, the numbers of blacks are quite low. As only a few thousand Indian slaves ended up being freedmen, the does not seem likely that all black color farmers in Oklahoma were their descendants. Countless must have migrated come Oklahoma as employees or tenants of Indian landowners, or after that as homesteaders or displaced tenants.

See more: What Is Birch Hard Or Soft Wood : Maple, Birch, Poplar Or Ash?

It is clear the the type of plantation-oriented black color sharecropping that existed in the Deep south after the Civil battle never developed in Oklahoma. In fact, the variety of black sharecroppers, just 4,560 in 1930, was quite small. Interestingly, there were 16,495 white sharecroppers at the very same time. Generally, the black color croppers and tenants had smaller farms that were much less productive, lowering their criter of living and making your tenure on the land even less secure.

A cultivation national problem in the 1930s, southern farm tenancy ended abruptly during and also after people War II. Federal government programs, mechanization, and also their very own inefficiency drive tenants native the land. Jobs and also a much better way the life lured castle to metropolitan areas. The renowned story the the Okies and also their migration come California vividly illustrates the finish of southerly farm tenancy. Few Americans would mourn the passing of together a system.