I thought about "bombastic" yet it doesn"t have actually that high quality of inaccuracy.
You are watching: A person who uses big words
The act of making use of a indigenous inaccurately can be dubbed catachresis. Catachresis is defined as: "the misuse or strained use of words, as in a blended metaphor, arising either in error or for rhetorical effect." Or as: "The usage of a word in a method that is not correct, because that example, the use of mitigate for militate.
It has actually the adjective type of catachrestic.
This entrance in Wikipedia says catachresis deserve to be either unintentional or intentional. It"s a funny word to say. Just be certain YOU use it correctly.
I think your summary of this person requires 2 words:
1 "inaccurately using complex or inexplicable words" = ignorant.
2 "in an effort to sound more intelligent" = pompous, pretentious
Although bombastic, pompous, and also pretentious are often synonymous, each has actually a various connotation and also use. Of these three, ns think that only pretentious indicates the probability or possibility of ignorance and misuse that words. Pomposity and bombast indicate overdramatization quite than deceit.
Jim: I'm no so certain either. But it is related to pretending. I believed of malapropism yet rejected that due to the fact that Mrs Malaprop wasn't intentionally deceitful or pompous or, perhaps, not even unaware the the exactly word as soon as calm and uninvolved in conversation, just confused, but a pretentious human being is on purpose pompous, most likely unconcerned around using the wrong word, and so doesn't mind gift an intentional or unintended fraud. Mrs Malaprop wasn't a fraud, just an inadvertently comedienne. I might be stretching things a bit here. I see that Chris said pretentious too.
Yes, that is. No dispute from me on that one. However pretending the one knows something one doesn't is likewise pretentious. Then, too, pretension (pretentiousness) is virtually always a mistake, n'est-ce pas?
The indigenous you"re trying to find is acyrologia. The human being who uses such words might probably be dubbed an acyrolog, back that"s a little bit of a neologism.
If the indigenous being puzzled are similar sounding, you"re managing a subcategory of acyrologia referred to as a malapropism or (less frequently) a dogberryism. Mrs. Malaprop is a personality in The Rivals by Richard Brinsley Sheridan. Dogberry is a character in Shakespeare"s much Ado about Nothing.
Catachresis can also be the misuse the words, although it connotes an knowingly misuse done for a rhetorical purpose.
For component (2) the your question
Or a native to define the plot of inaccurately using complicated or unusual words (often in an effort to sound an ext intelligent)?
Henry Fowler describes them as "genteelisms" in his book modern-day ubraintv-jp.com Usage.
Given the description, and if you"re trying to use it to provide something a bit of colour rather than looking for the technical word to explain the method the words are used, i think mine favourite descriptive pick would be bluster, or blustering. While not a definite hit for the particular case of using lengthy or facility words, it certainly carries a self-important air together with the implicitly of inaccuracy or exaggeration, and the specifics can easily (and, perhaps, entertainingly) it is in elaborated top top later.
I think she actually searching for two different concepts.
Where trying to sound more intelligent is came to I’d be tempted come use the word affected, in the feeling of “assumed or presented artificially; placed on because that effect; artificial, stilted, ‘got up’ ” (source Oxford ubraintv-jp.com Dictionary).
There to be a good line in an illustration of Frasier where, describing such a person, Frasier said, “Nothing is fairly so irksome as influenced erudition.”
In regards to using words incorrectly, incorrect or any of the variants will do.
The word you"re in search of is malapropism.
The term comes from the 18th Century play The Rivals, i beg your pardon satirises the propensity you have described. In the play over there is a character dubbed Mrs. Malaprop that habitually confuses impressive-sounding Latinate indigenous to an excellent comic effect. Her name mirrors the expression mal a propos, which is borrowed from French and means ill-suited.
If I understand you correctly, you"re mostly referring come the scenario wherein someone simply uses large incorrect words simply to sound intelligent or smart.
I personally don"t think there"s currently any one word for this but this can frequently be observed in human being who have low self-esteem and also often desire to exaggeration their importance.
In the case, i think you can call them grandiose and they can be stated to be ego-deprived.
See more: How Long Is The Buckman Bridge S: Buckman Bridge, Buckman Bridge
I think you may be searching for acyrologia. It"s a type of rhetoric that covers things prefer malapropism and also cacozelia.
Highly energetic question. Knife 10 call (not counting the combination bonus) in order come answer this question. The reputation need helps defend this question from spam and also non-answer activity.
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged expressions adjectives pejorative-language epithet-requests catachresis or questioning your own question.
A native for as soon as a native is used wrongly (grammatically) however can still be parsed in a grammatically correct way?
What is a ax for making use of a huge word that the speaker/writer plainly thinks method something other than what it does?
site architecture / logo © 2021 stack Exchange Inc; user contributions license is granted under cc by-sa. Rev2021.11.10.40715